Monday 16 May 2011

Science...

Science has completely lost the point. It seems people are not yet evolved enough to comprehend science. We see science far more complicated that we should, often we overlook the common sense in order to find a scientific, complicated, and often un concluded theories.
  • Time travel - Is it possible that people still think time travel is possible? Is it true that our knowledge of physics doesn’t rule out any sort of time travel? To travel through time we would have to jump from one point in time to the other. Time is a dimension, how can something skip from one place in a dimension to another? Why don’t we think we can jump through space the same way, by simply ceasing to exist in one place and emerging in the other? 
  • Parallel universes - The theory of parallel universes.. This I will never get over. The theory is there is an infinite number of parallel universes that exist at a same time and the same place and do not come in any sort of contact with the other universes and there is a separate universe for every possible scenario that could ever have played out regardless weather it is possible or not since just because it is not possible in our universe, it might be possible in respective parallel universe. And that, my friends, is not science. That is bullshit; you can’t have a scientific theory represented by physicists who claim there are no rules of physics at all, but rather coincidental rules that just happen to exist in our universe. This theory is insane, it represents 'random' as a basic and only rule responsible for everything
  • Random - It is not the basic rule of anything, in fact random does not exist at all. Random means that something happens for no reason at all, it just did, yet one of the basic rules of physics states that every action causes an equal reaction. If someone told you to say a random number, the number you would say will not be a random number, that number would have been predetermined by our genetic code and all the experiences in your life till that point. A car doesn’t run you over because it randomly happened, it happened because you were on a certain time and place and in certain condition which allowed the moving vehicle that was in that time and place and certain condition, the driver might have looked away, maybe he died of heart attack, or his brakes failed, but certainly wasn’t random. 
  • RANDOM DOES NOT, AND CAN NOT EXIST therefore parallel universes can’t exist either because the only possible scenario is played out in our universe, because everything happens for a reason, and parallel universes can not exist unless everything was based on 'random'
Those are just the most obvious things, you don’t need to be a scientist to understand, yet scientist still claim they’re not the way they are. Why? Could Stephen Hawking possibly believe in something that clearly makes no sense, after a lifetime of studying that very thing? I think not. I don’t know why he claims he does, maybe just because he can, people believe him, don’t they? I don’t blame him, I blame us for taking things like that for granted even though they make no sense what so ever.

Those are just the very basics of understanding our existence and existence of everything around us. Thousands of years of our awareness and trying to figure out the existence and we still don’t have those basics cleared. Makes you wonder, if we can’t understand those very basics, how could we ever understand the full potential of our species, of our technological limits. The technology is already way ahead of us, and it is getting hard to keep track of it. Only the knowledge we are now capable of, combined with technology we already know could give us unimaginable results, yet we are not even trying to figure it out, we are just trying to develop more new technologies whilst we are only upgrading technologies we already have.

Maybe I am wrong. My credentials are clearly nothing compared to the reputation of one Stephen Hawking, and you are wright to presume he is right and I am wrong. But don’t you think we deserve evidence before we accept a ridiculous theory that makes no sense? 
When Dr. Hawking claims information from material that gets sucked in to a black hole simply disappears, and is challenged by other scientist because one of our very principals of science is that it is impossible for information to disappear, his answer is that information didn’t disappear, but still exists in parallel universes, we should just accept it with absolutely no proof? When we can say with a 100% certainty the parallel universe theory doesn't exist because it is simply impossible?

We need to open our eyes, and question the world around us, rather than focusing on sole survival in this unnatural habitat.

  • bloBspotdotcom.blogspot.com





No comments:

Post a Comment